36c59e81f69c4deaad95c25f0ac80317 1 big1

News from The Associated Press

WILLISTON, Vt. (AP) — At Tomorrow’s Harvest farm, you won’t find acres of land on which animals graze, or rows of corn, or bales of hay. Just stacks of boxes in a basement and the summery song of thousands of chirping crickets.It’s one of a growing number of operations raising crickets for human consumption that these farmers say is more ecologically sound than meat but acknowledge is sure to bug some people out.Once consumers get beyond the ick factor, they say, there are a lot of benefits to consuming bugs.

“We don’t need everybody to eat insects,” said Robert Nathan Allen, founder and director of Little Herds, an educational nonprofit in Austin, Texas, that promotes the use of insects for human food and animal feed. “The point we really like to highlight with the education is that if only a small percent of people add this to their diet, there’s a huge environmental impact.”Cricket fans say if only 1 percent of the U.S. population substituted even just 1 percent of their meat consumption with insects, millions of gallons of water in drinking and irrigation would be saved, along with thousands of metric tons of greenhouse-gas emissions from machinery and animals.

At least one study finds the claims overstated that crickets are a viable protein source to supplement or replace meat, but bottom line, it generally takes fewer resources to raise and harvest crickets than, say, cattle.Interest in entomology – the consumption of insects – was fueled in part by a 2013 report from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations on the viability of edible insects to help curb world hunger.

Since then, the number of producers of food containing crickets, from protein bars to chip, has jumped from zero to about 20, and cricket farms for human food have grown to about half a dozen in the United States, Allen said.Self-described adventurous eater Matthew Monroe, 53, of Portland, Oregon, said he’s fond of blueberry-vanilla Exo bars containing cricket flour and dines on them when he gets that “protein bar j feeling.” They also taste better than other protein bars, he said.

There’s no problem selling crickets as long as manufacturers ensure the food they produce for the U.S. market is safe and complies with all relevant laws and Food and Drug Administration regulations, including proper labeling.Raising crickets doesn’t take much space, but there are complexities.Stephen Swanson, proprietor of Tomorrow’s Harvest, said he constantly checks conditions – water, food, temperature, air flow and humidity – in the basement where he’s raising roughly half a million crickets.

Swanson, who just started selling cricket protein powder online, hopes to get into a warehouse where some of the work could be automated.”The sky’s the limit. This is the stone age right now as far as insect farming,” he said. “So we have nowhere to go but up.”Kevin Bachhuber knows that firsthand. He started the first U.S. cricket farm for human food in the Youngstown, Ohio, area, according to Allen. It operated until lead in his water supply prompted him to close it, Bachhuber said.

Now, Bachhuber said, he is helping new cricket farmers get started or existing farms that raise crickets for reptile feed and fish bait get up to food grade standards.”For the first couple years, you know, we always struggled with having enough supply. Now that we’re starting to be able to add some of these older farmers into our supply chain. … It’s not quite so heavy pressure,” Bachhuber said.The first U.S. academic conference devoted to insects for food and feed was held in Detroit in May. Now the young industry is forming The North American Edible Insect Coalition , a trade group, with the priorities being research and public education.”Half the battle if not more is educating people why. You can’t just say, ‘Eat crickets, please.’ You have to tell them why,” Swanson said.

 

SOURCE…hosted.ap.org

student ipad 2290537b large trans NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwZwVSIA7rSIkPn18jgFKEo01

The New Black Plague…. "Electronic Screen Syndrome".

 The new black plague “Electronic  Screen Syndrome” Studies have also shown that using computers, smartphones or tablets before bedtime disrupts sleep.Sir Anthony Seldon the Vice Chancellor of the University of Buckingham and former master of Wellington College said screen time was a ‘very significant concern’.“Intelligent use of computers can enhance the life of teenagers but overall they are spending vastly too much time online,” he added.“Real people, real exercise, real environments and above all real relationships in the flesh are what young people need to develop into healthy adults.“I’m extremely worried by the extensive and indiscriminate exposure of adolescents to computers. It should be a very significant concern.”

The researchers of the new study agreed that electronic devices could be harmful if youngsters were using them to avoid exercise, sleep or avoid making friends. But they also said they could actually be beneficial for development.Co-author Dr Netta Weinstein of Cardiff University said: “To the extent that digital activities either enrich teenagers’ lives or displace more rewarding activities, they should have either positive or negative effects on their mental well-being.

“There have been theories that digital use is disrupting more satisfying pursuits. However, the role of digital technology has a central role in everyday life and online gaming is now a shared way of playing for teenage boys.“There is good reason to think digital technology used in moderation is not disruptive and may even support development.’

Commenting on the research, Dr Pete Etchells, senior lecturer in Biological Psychology, Bath Spa University, said: “The study shows that certain levels of technology use may actually be beneficial to children.”Where negative effects do exist, these are in fact quite weak, compared to other factors such as getting a decent night’s sleep which have previously been shown to have an influence on well-being. “Taken altogether then, the study shows that we need to drastically reconsider the way we think about screen time – there is an alarming  negative correlation between using digital technology and well being.

 

 

SOURCE…www.telegraph.co.uk

student ipad 2290537b large trans NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwZwVSIA7rSIkPn18jgFKEo01

The New Black Plague…. “Electronic Screen Syndrome”.

 The new black plague “Electronic  Screen Syndrome” Studies have also shown that using computers, smartphones or tablets before bedtime disrupts sleep.Sir Anthony Seldon the Vice Chancellor of the University of Buckingham and former master of Wellington College said screen time was a ‘very significant concern’.“Intelligent use of computers can enhance the life of teenagers but overall they are spending vastly too much time online,” he added.“Real people, real exercise, real environments and above all real relationships in the flesh are what young people need to develop into healthy adults.“I’m extremely worried by the extensive and indiscriminate exposure of adolescents to computers. It should be a very significant concern.”

The researchers of the new study agreed that electronic devices could be harmful if youngsters were using them to avoid exercise, sleep or avoid making friends. But they also said they could actually be beneficial for development.Co-author Dr Netta Weinstein of Cardiff University said: “To the extent that digital activities either enrich teenagers’ lives or displace more rewarding activities, they should have either positive or negative effects on their mental well-being.

“There have been theories that digital use is disrupting more satisfying pursuits. However, the role of digital technology has a central role in everyday life and online gaming is now a shared way of playing for teenage boys.“There is good reason to think digital technology used in moderation is not disruptive and may even support development.’

Commenting on the research, Dr Pete Etchells, senior lecturer in Biological Psychology, Bath Spa University, said: “The study shows that certain levels of technology use may actually be beneficial to children.”Where negative effects do exist, these are in fact quite weak, compared to other factors such as getting a decent night’s sleep which have previously been shown to have an influence on well-being. “Taken altogether then, the study shows that we need to drastically reconsider the way we think about screen time – there is an alarming  negative correlation between using digital technology and well being.

 

 

SOURCE…www.telegraph.co.uk

multi131

Why Smart People Don’t Multitask

You may have heard that multitasking is bad for you, but studies show that it kills your performance and may even damage your brain. Every time you multitask you aren’t just harming your performance in the moment; you may very well be damaging an area of your brain that’s critical to your future success at work. Research conducted at Stanford University found that multitasking is less productive than doing a single thing at a time. The researchers found that people who are regularly bombarded with several streams of electronic information cannot pay attention, recall information, or switch from one job to another as well as those who complete one task at a time.

 

A Special Skill?

But what if some people have a special gift for multitasking? The Stanford researchers compared groups of people based on their tendency to multitask and their belief that it helps their performance. They found that heavy multitaskERS — those who multitask a lot and feel that it boosts their performance — were actually worse at multitasking than those who like to do a single thing at a time. The frequent multitaskers performed worse because they had more trouble organizing their thoughts and filtering out irrelevant information, and they were slower at switching from one task to another.

Ouch!!!

Multitasking reduces your efficiency and performance because your brain can only focus on one thing at a time. When you try to do two things at once, your brain lacks the capacity to perform both tasks successfully.

Multitasking Lowers IQ

Research also shows that, in addition to slowing you down, multitasking lowers your IQ. A study at the University of London found that participants who multi tasked during cognitive tasks experienced IQ score declines that were similar to what they’d expect if they had smoked marijuana or stayed up all night. IQ drops of 15 points for multitasking men lowered their scores to the average range of an 8-year-old child.

So the next time you’re writing your boss an email during a meeting, remember that your cognitive capacity is being diminished to the point that you might as well let an 8-year-old write it for you.

Brain Damage From Multitasking?

It was long believed that cognitive impairment from multitasking was temporary, but new research suggests otherwise. Researchers at the University of Sussex in the UK compared the amount of time people spend on multiple devices (such as texting while watching TV) to MRI scans of their brains. They found that high multitaskers had less brain density in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region responsible for empathy as well as cognitive and emotional control.While more research is needed to determine if multitasking is physically damaging the brain (versus existing brain damage that predisposes people to multitask), it’s clear that multitasking has negative effects.

Neuroscientist Kep Kee Loh, the study’s lead author, explained the implications:“I feel that it is important to create an awareness that the way we are interacting with the devices might be changing the way we think and these changes might be occurring at the level of brain structure.”

The EQ Connection

Nothing turns people off quite like fiddling with your phone or tablet during a conversation. Multitasking in meetings and other social settings indicates low Self- and Social Awareness, two emotional intelligence (EQ) skills that are critical to success at work. TalentSmart has tested more than a million people and found that 90% of top performers have high EQs. If multitasking does indeed damage the anterior cingulate cortex (a key brain region for EQ) as current research suggests, doing so will lower your EQ while it alienates your coworkers.

Bringing It All Together

If you’re prone to multitasking, this is not a habit you’ll want to indulge—it clearly slows you down and decreases the quality of your work. Even if it doesn’t cause brain damage, allowing yourself to multitask will fuel any existing difficulties you have with concentration, organization, and attention to detail.

SOURCE…www.cnbc.com

multi131

Why Smart People Don’t Multitask

You may have heard that multitasking is bad for you, but studies show that it kills your performance and may even damage your brain. Every time you multitask you aren’t just harming your performance in the moment; you may very well be damaging an area of your brain that’s critical to your future success at work. Research conducted at Stanford University found that multitasking is less productive than doing a single thing at a time. The researchers found that people who are regularly bombarded with several streams of electronic information cannot pay attention, recall information, or switch from one job to another as well as those who complete one task at a time.

 

A Special Skill?

But what if some people have a special gift for multitasking? The Stanford researchers compared groups of people based on their tendency to multitask and their belief that it helps their performance. They found that heavy multitaskERS — those who multitask a lot and feel that it boosts their performance — were actually worse at multitasking than those who like to do a single thing at a time. The frequent multitaskers performed worse because they had more trouble organizing their thoughts and filtering out irrelevant information, and they were slower at switching from one task to another.

Ouch!!!

Multitasking reduces your efficiency and performance because your brain can only focus on one thing at a time. When you try to do two things at once, your brain lacks the capacity to perform both tasks successfully.

Multitasking Lowers IQ

Research also shows that, in addition to slowing you down, multitasking lowers your IQ. A study at the University of London found that participants who multi tasked during cognitive tasks experienced IQ score declines that were similar to what they’d expect if they had smoked marijuana or stayed up all night. IQ drops of 15 points for multitasking men lowered their scores to the average range of an 8-year-old child.

So the next time you’re writing your boss an email during a meeting, remember that your cognitive capacity is being diminished to the point that you might as well let an 8-year-old write it for you.

Brain Damage From Multitasking?

It was long believed that cognitive impairment from multitasking was temporary, but new research suggests otherwise. Researchers at the University of Sussex in the UK compared the amount of time people spend on multiple devices (such as texting while watching TV) to MRI scans of their brains. They found that high multitaskers had less brain density in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region responsible for empathy as well as cognitive and emotional control.While more research is needed to determine if multitasking is physically damaging the brain (versus existing brain damage that predisposes people to multitask), it’s clear that multitasking has negative effects.

Neuroscientist Kep Kee Loh, the study’s lead author, explained the implications:“I feel that it is important to create an awareness that the way we are interacting with the devices might be changing the way we think and these changes might be occurring at the level of brain structure.”

The EQ Connection

Nothing turns people off quite like fiddling with your phone or tablet during a conversation. Multitasking in meetings and other social settings indicates low Self- and Social Awareness, two emotional intelligence (EQ) skills that are critical to success at work. TalentSmart has tested more than a million people and found that 90% of top performers have high EQs. If multitasking does indeed damage the anterior cingulate cortex (a key brain region for EQ) as current research suggests, doing so will lower your EQ while it alienates your coworkers.

Bringing It All Together

If you’re prone to multitasking, this is not a habit you’ll want to indulge—it clearly slows you down and decreases the quality of your work. Even if it doesn’t cause brain damage, allowing yourself to multitask will fuel any existing difficulties you have with concentration, organization, and attention to detail.

SOURCE…www.cnbc.com

http   prod.static9.net .au   media Network Images 2017 01 10 14 34 in the sauna 1710011

The Truth Behind The Science Of The Sauna

It’s estimated that there are over 3 million saunas in Finland – roughly one for every house, public park and high-rise apartment in the country.(Considering the Finns boast a population of just 5 million, it’s fair to say they know a thing or two about sweating it up in the nude.)

 The average Finn has a sauna session about once a week, and before the circulation of healthcare programs many Finnish mothers gave birth in saunas thanks to the largely sterile environment. To them, a sauna is invigorating for both mental and physical health.But is the art of steaming yourself like a piece of broccoli simply some weird northern European throwback, or can it actually improve your health?According to Aidan Rich, APA sports physiotherapist, the sauna sort of straddles the line between cultural practice and sports tool – although the current research is showing a lot of promise.

“Sauna use appears to be quite low risk, particularly if there are no other serious health conditions,” Rich tells Coach.”There are many potential benefits such as heart health, improved endurance, as well as the social and relaxation benefits that a sauna may offer.”Aside from these, sauna use may give a feeling of relaxation, or enjoyable social interaction, which may account for the ‘feel good’ effect that people experience after using a sauna.”

Of course, Rich is quick to point out that you cannot simply recommend everybody to immediately jump into the sauna, because (surprise surprise) sitting in a small room as hot as 80 degrees Celsius is not going to agree with everyone.”Sauna or extreme heat exposure can potentially be dangerous, particularly when undertaken for prolonged periods, with any form of exercise, or unsupervised,” warns Rich.”It’s recommended that you discuss with your doctor before undertaking any of the treatments or training discussed.”

It’s more strenuous than you might imagine

For most Australians, sitting in the sauna is something that you would only do after a hard session in the gym or a leisurely swim in some upmarket hotel pool.In almost all cases, sauna use is seen as a form of recovery where you can recharge and refresh, but Rich says this is a common misconception amongst gym goers.”Sauna exposure should be seen as an additional training stress,” explains Rich.”Using a sauna has been shown to provide similar benefits to regular exercise, such as lower resting heart rate, higher red blood cell count, and better core temperature regulation during exercise.”

That’s right – stripping off to spend a period of time in a hot wooden room is just about the only way you can increase your athletic performance while sitting on your butt, but Rich says it’s important not to go overboard.”Sauna training exposure can be used as an adjunct to traditional training such as cardiovascular exercise — such as a walk, ride, swim, run — and resistance or weight training,” says Rich. “The best times to use a sauna would be on an ‘easy’ or light training day.”A sauna really shouldn’t be used on a hard training day, when instead priority should be given to more traditional recovery methods such as eating well or light stretching after intense exercise.”

The detox myth

Many people believe that a session in the sauna allows your body to remove toxins from your blood by sweating them out, and it’s a claim that many celebrities are fond of making,Gwyneth Paltrow uses saunas to “sweat out all the germs” she receives from other passengers on airplanes, and Jennifer Aniston and Lady Gaga regularly promote saunas as a way to rejuvenate cells and control pain.Sadly, Rich explains there’s no evidence behind the detoxifying nature of the sauna – it turns out that your kidneys and liver do a fine job of that as it is.”Unfortunately the sauna and toxins theory has been debunked by research!” says Rich.”However with all of the other benefits of sauna use or heat exposure, there are still plenty of reasons to use a sauna!”

How to use a sauna

So it turns out that saunas can be pretty damn helpful, especially if you find them relaxing. But getting the most out of a steam room isn’t as simple as plopping yourself down on a wooden bench and staying until even your ears have pruned up.According to Rich, there are several ways that have been proven in research to help fast-track the benefits of sauna, and almost all of them involve taking regular breaks. “Several short periods — for example, two to three visits each lasting three to five minutes — have been shown to be a relaxation tool,” says Rich. 

“It’s possible that even short, regular exposure to heat has positive effects on longevity, and heart disease, although the exact relationships between heat exposure and these outcomes are still being investigated.”If jumping in and out every couple of minutes sounds like too much hassle (especially when you’re near-nude), then longer stretches can be helpful too.”Longer periods of up to 20-30 minutes appears to have significant benefits such as improved endurance in sport, decreased muscle breakdown when weight training, and improved blood sugar control,” explains Rich.

For the hardcore types, there’s even some evidence that pulling the bench press into the sauna could supercharge your strength – although you wouldn’t want to be caught dead doing it in your local gym.”Exercise in the sauna, or another hot environment, is another way that’s been recommended,” says Rich.

“There is some research currently underway in New Zealand that is investigating doing weight training in a very hot environment.”It appears that lifting lighter weights in a hot environment may give the same strength benefit as lifting heavy weights in a normal temperature environment, but without as much muscular soreness and fatigue.”

 
SOURCE…coach.nine.com